Your 2026 Plan Has Too Many Priorities
The word "priority" was singular for most of its history. It meant the one thing that came first. Somewhere along the way we started saying "priorities," and planning decks have been getting longer ever since.
If your 2026 plan has twelve priorities, it has none.
Why is strategic prioritization so hard?
Strategic prioritization is hard because every item on the list has a sponsor, and dropping it feels like a judgment on that person. It's socially easier to keep everything and dilute effort than to choose and disappoint someone. The result is a plan where everything moves a little and nothing moves enough.
The forced-rank exercise

The forced rank is uncomfortable on purpose. Ties aren't allowed. When two items both feel like number one, the debate about which one actually comes first is where the real strategy work happens.
A plan with twelve priorities is a wish list with a budget.
What happens to everything below the line?
It doesn't disappear. It gets an honest label: maintain, pause, or stop. "Maintain" means keep it running without new investment. "Pause" means revisit at mid-year. "Stop" means stop. Naming these explicitly is what keeps below-the-line work from quietly creeping back into everyone's week.
This is the planning cousin of treating budget season as strategy season. The ranking should drive the money.
The takeaway
Before your 2026 plan locks, run the forced rank with your leadership team and draw the line at three. Then tell the organization what's below it. Clarity like this is often the most valuable output of our business strategy work.
Frequently asked questions
How many strategic priorities should a company have?
Three is a practical number for most organizations. Beyond that, attention and resources spread too thin for any priority to get meaningful progress.
What is a forced ranking of priorities?
A method where every initiative is ranked in strict order with no ties, forcing leaders to make explicit tradeoffs about what matters most.
What should you do with initiatives that are not priorities?
Label each one clearly as maintain, pause, or stop, and communicate that decision so teams don't keep investing effort by default.
Planning 2026 and the list keeps growing? Let's force the rank.




Comments